Hi team,
I know that we have this flow
“Incognito -> Incognito smart contract -> Proxy smart contract -> 3rd-smart contract”
And in this flow of communication, we send a request with a single token to the smart contract. I consider that we can update something by making a request with a map or array token(instead of a single token). I think by this way, we will make our flow smoother in integration, and the general process also. Your team can consider this modifcation
Updates for the week of March 16 - 22, 2020:
@duc @tien is it possible for you guys to share the ui/ux screenshots here so the community can review? i’m personally super excited to use uniswap and compound anonymously 
and so are our friends at constant and their large userbase!
hey there, below is the screenshots for trading flow, this is very first/minimal version and we’re trying to make it similar to PDEX’s so anyone can find it familiar 
Still working on the iterations (especially fees stuff) and any feedback is very welcome!
Updates for the week of March 23 - 29, 2020:
This is an awesome project! I cant wait to write my own contracts usable from the Incognito wallet.
Updates for the week of April 6 - 12, 2020
in terms of QA, is it possible to share more detail ex: number of test cases, % of test coverage, number of open bug, number of resolved bug, number of closed bug …
The whole process of this project might be split into 2 main parties: smart contracts and pDeFI app.
For the smart contracts, the test is covering more than 95% logic and @henry can you share the testing report for the app side here?
By the way, just wanted to update some changes for the project plan; due to lots of money will likely be put into the smart contracts in future, it would be the best to figure out how to prevent security flaws/attacks of these contracts right from testnet stage (instead of moving things to mainnet in a hurry and getting hacked badly) so we decided to postpone the launch this week and spend more time for security testing (probably about 3 weeks) before proceeding further.
Hi Zon,
For now, requirement is not clearly and stable. So, we don’t write testcase for feature while developing. However, I write checklist about function which is stable.
This checklist is basic case. About withdraw function and notification for Puniswap, I don’t checklist because requirement is changing. I send you bug and checklist which is tracked when testing. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UQIqJtP2jYTW4gbOnaf_F8HZjK1uSou0jexG1uslwtg/edit#gid=0
Thanks.
Updates for the week of April 13 - 17, 2020:
We’ve launched pUniswap Testnet, for more details please have a look at its launch proposal at Launch pKyber Testnet - privacy for DeFI
Regarding pCompound, we’ve still been working on backend apis (recall that the pCompound adapter contract was deployed on Ethereum testing last week, the deployed address is 0x2400eD5B1c9b61256e987f9731fFca987d3dB878)
We’ll be continuing to work on backend apis for pCompound in the next week.
Hi @team,
Can I have a question for you? In this specific case, I want to have a question about pCompound with this flow
.
I see that Stateful Proxy pCompound needs to create an agent(be also a smart contract) to process with Compound Smart contract. And fee of this action comes from the founder team.
That means if someone wants to make collateral on Compound with 0.5 pETH on Incognito, he need to burn 0.5pETH ~ 0.5 ETH in Vault and we will process with agent and Compound to make a collateral 0.5 ETH on Compound. We will pay fee, right? So we can consider, whether we have any way to charge F% on amount of user, and use it(F%x0.5 ETH) as fee, that mean user burn 0.5 pETH but collateral in Compound is (0.5 - F%x0.5) ETH. You guys can skim this solutions somehow, can you?
Thank
Hello a @thaibao
in the long run, the fees should have to be paid by user who use features provided by incognito (for example, trade on puniswap or borrow on pcompound). Probably there are 2 options for paying fees that user can choose; peth or prv. And incognito backend service will use the fee to cover gas/expense of the requesting operations.
@harry recently joined Incognito’s interoperability team to help build cool stuff. Previously, @harry worked for one of the biggest e-commerce systems in Vietnam called Tiki. He has had experiences with the popular programming languages as well as messaging systems like Kafka in a microservices architecture. He’s strongly interested in building scalable and reliable systems with low latency APIs. On a less serious note, as a human, he’d love to sleep well at night by building monitoring systems apart from the main system.
So the members of this proposal are: me (@tien) , @thachtb and @harry.
I am very excited about this project. Is there a plan for how these papps will be managed within the incognito app visually? There could be many more of these that get implemented and I wonder what the UI will be like within the Incognito app.
Will there be an API or SDK that gets developed where Uniswap, Kyber or compound could choose to integrate the privacy option directly on their site or app?
some key papps will be built natively into the app - like pDEX and the Wallet are two reference papps.
most of the papps are hosted by the developers themselves. to access these apps tap on Browser, enter an URL, and start using it.
@duc and i half-way through the developer guides on how to build papps. hope to complete it soon (within a week or two) and share it with the community. can’t wait to see what the community will be building!
Wow! Very cool.
So Uniswap will have the choice whether they want to integrate the incognito mode apk on their site or not?
When the trade takes place on pUniswap the trading fees will go to the uniswap pool providers correct…not to a node holder?
trading fee – yep, while in incognito mode, trading fees go to uniswap the same way you trade publicly on uniswap.
privacy fee – there is a small fee for privacy that goes to incognito nodes who help facilitate the transactions from incognito to ethereum and back. these are similar to the transaction fees that you’re paying now to node owners when you send a tx on the incognito network.
So are you guys trying to get privacy on smart contracts also??? or only on assets???
